FAKE NEWS AND MISINFORMATION IN NIGERIAN ONLINE MEDIA SPACES
ABSTRACT
The proliferation of fake news and misinformation in Nigerian online media spaces has emerged as one of the most pressing threats to democratic governance, public health, social cohesion, and national security in contemporary Nigeria. This study critically examines the nature, scope, drivers, and consequences of fake news and misinformation within Nigerian digital media environments, with particular attention to the socio-political, technological, and structural conditions that facilitate the production and rapid dissemination of false information. Anchored in the theoretical frameworks of Agenda-Setting Theory, the Information Disorder Model, and the Two-Step Flow of Communication, the study draws extensively on a review of recent empirical literature, policy documents, and institutional reports to interrogate the multidimensional character of information disorder in Nigeria. Findings from the literature indicate that social media platforms particularly Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter/X, and YouTube have become the primary conduits for fake news dissemination in Nigeria, exploiting low levels of media literacy, ethno-religious polarisation, economic incentives for clickbait content, and inadequate regulatory frameworks. The weaponisation of misinformation during electoral cycles, including the 2019 and 2023 general elections, has had demonstrable consequences for democratic participation and institutional trust. Additionally, the study identifies the role of deepfakes, AI-generated content, and coordinated troll farms as emerging vectors of information disorder. The study recommends robust investment in digital media literacy education, strengthening of fact-checking institutions, enactment of balanced regulatory frameworks that protect free expression while curbing harmful misinformation, and greater accountability from social media platforms operating within Nigeria. The study contributes to the growing body of scholarship on misinformation in sub-Saharan Africa and provides a foundation for evidence-based policy interventions.
Keywords: Fake news, misinformation, disinformation, Nigeria, online media, social media, information disorder, digital journalism, electoral misinformation, media literacy.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
The contemporary global information ecosystem is in the grip of an unprecedented crisis of truth. False, misleading, and deliberately fabricated information variously described as fake news, misinformation, and disinformation has come to define a new era of media disorder, one in which the boundaries between fact and fiction are increasingly difficult to discern. Nowhere is this crisis more acutely felt than in Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation and its largest economy, where the rapid expansion of digital connectivity has coincided with an explosive growth in the production and dissemination of false information across online media platforms. The intersection of a young, digitally engaged population, deep ethno-religious fault lines, a politically volatile environment, and weak regulatory institutions has created fertile ground for the flourishing of information disorder on an alarming scale.
The emergence of the internet and, more critically, social media as dominant forces in information sharing has fundamentally altered the architecture of public communication. As Wardle and Derakhshan (2017) observed in their foundational report for the Council of Europe, the world is now experiencing a form of “information disorder” that encompasses three interrelated phenomena: misinformation, which involves the inadvertent sharing of false information; disinformation, which involves the deliberate creation and sharing of content known to be false; and malinformation, which involves the use of genuine information to cause harm. This tripartite model has provided scholars and policymakers with a more nuanced conceptual vocabulary for understanding false information beyond the reductive label of “fake news.” Tandoc, Lim, and Ling (2018), in their influential typology of scholarly definitions, further identified six categories of fake news news satire, news parody, fabrication, manipulation, advertising, and propaganda each varying in degrees of facticity and deceptive intent.
While the global discourse on misinformation gained renewed urgency following the 2016 United States presidential election and the Brexit referendum, the problem is by no means unique to the Global North. In sub-Saharan Africa, and in Nigeria in particular, the infodemic of false information has deep historical roots, predating the digital era, but has assumed qualitatively new dimensions in the age of social media. As the Social Science Research Council (2020) observed, disinformation in Nigeria is not a novel phenomenon Nigerian journalist Sola Odunfa, writing as far back as 2009, noted that a pervasive “rumour mill” had for decades operated alongside and within the conventional media, with many newspapers publishing products of the rumour mill as authentic news. What is fundamentally new is the speed, scale, and sophistication with which false information now circulates, enabled by the democratisation of content production and the algorithmic architecture of social media platforms.
The Nigerian digital media landscape has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past decade. According to DataReportal’s Digital 2024 report, Nigeria had 103 million internet users at the start of 2024, representing an internet penetration rate of 45.5 percent of the total population. The country is home to 36.75 million social media users, with Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Twitter/X, and YouTube being the most widely used platforms. Mobile connectivity is the dominant mode of internet access, with 205.4 million cellular mobile connections active in the country. The Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) recorded an increase of 7.6 million internet subscriptions between January and December 2023 alone. This remarkable expansion of digital connectivity, while enabling civic participation and access to information, has simultaneously created vast new channels through which false and harmful information can rapidly reach millions of Nigerians with little or no institutional gatekeeping.
The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (2024) noted that social media is widely used for news in Nigeria, but that misinformation and hate speech present significant integrity concerns. The Institute observed that traditional media such as television and print have been losing reach and influence as digital and social media play an increasingly dominant role in shaping public discourse. In this environment, as Umejei, Ajaero, and Samuels (2024) have noted in their study published in Current Psychology, fake news has become a local phenomenon with global dimensions, shaped by motivations that range from political manipulation and economic incentives to social conformity and the desire for validation within digital communities.
Nigeria’s pluralistic character comprising over 250 ethnic nationalities and a population roughly divided between Christianity and Islam renders it especially susceptible to the deployment of misinformation as a tool of ethno-religious mobilisation and political manipulation. Inobemhe, Apuke, and colleagues (2020) observed that misinformation in Nigeria has assumed a universal dimension, with its negative consequences becoming a source of profound national concern. The Centre for Democracy and Development West Africa (CDD West Africa) documented in a 2022 study that social media platforms are common avenues for spreading misinformation and disinformation in Nigeria, and that false or misleading information online impacts the information space offline as well, with Facebook and Twitter/X posts frequently reprinted in newspapers and shared in radio broadcasts. This blurring of the online/offline boundary has made it increasingly difficult to contain the spread of false narratives once they enter the information ecosystem.
The electoral arena has emerged as the most visible battleground for misinformation in Nigeria. Ahead of the 2023 general elections, experts and activists documented an unprecedented expansion in the scope and sophistication of political misinformation. Al Jazeera (2023) reported that political actors had become significantly more adept at creating and amplifying false messaging than in previous electoral cycles, and that even established media organisations had fallen for misinformation and been compelled to retract stories. A BBC investigation published in January 2023 revealed that Nigerian political parties regularly paid networks of social media influencers and micro-influencers as much as 20 million naira (approximately $43,000) to spread disinformation about political opponents, often exploiting ethnic and religious differences. Freedom House (2024) documented that some political leaders shared inauthentic election results and footage falsely claiming that ballot-box stuffing was widespread, contributing to widespread public confusion about the integrity of the electoral process.
The 2023 elections also witnessed the deployment of artificial intelligence-generated deepfakes a qualitatively new dimension of misinformation that poses particular challenges for detection and debunking. Ajakaiye (2024), writing for the Institute for Security and Technology, documented the use of AI-generated deepfakes and shallow fakes intended to enhance or undermine the public perception of presidential candidates, with manipulated photographs falsely depicting vice-presidential candidate Kashim Shettima as a member of the Islamist militant group Boko Haram circulating widely on social media. This represents a convergence of political manipulation and emerging technologies that has alarmed scholars, civil society organisations, and democratic governance practitioners across Africa.
Beyond electoral misinformation, fake news in Nigeria has had devastating real-world consequences in domains including public health, inter-communal violence, and national security. The herdsmen/farmers crisis in Nigeria’s Middle Belt region has been significantly aggravated by the circulation of false and inflammatory content on social media. The BBC documented how fake pictures circulating on social media falsely claiming to depict inter-communal violence inflamed already high tensions in the country. Following a deadly attack on remote communities in Plateau State on Christmas Eve 2023, Freedom House (2024) reported that coordinated social media accounts spread false information about the attacks using unrelated photographs and videos, heightening the risk of further offline violence. The COVID-19 pandemic similarly produced a debilitating “infodemic” of health misinformation that undermined public health responses and endangered lives.
The structural conditions that facilitate the production and spread of fake news in Nigeria are both numerous and deeply entrenched. Apuke and Omar (2020) identified several key drivers of fake news proliferation in Nigeria, including the dominance of social media platforms as primary information sources, varying levels of media literacy across the population, the economic incentive structure of digital advertising which rewards high traffic regardless of content quality, and the political and economic interests served by false information during electoral and governance crises. Jibril et al. (2025) and Akpan et al. (2024) have concurred that technological advancements have expanded the reach and complexity of misinformation, leading to what Wardle and Derakhshan (2017) memorably described as “information pollution” of the media landscape. This pollution has, as a study published in the journal New Media and the Proliferation of Fake News in Nigeria concluded, compromised the professional judgment of Nigerian journalists, particularly in their capacity to process information for public consumption.
The Nigerian online media environment is itself characterised by a paradox of abundance and accountability deficit. While the country boasts over 80 locally owned digital news outlets and startups alongside dozens of established national and regional media organisations, economic pressures including dwindling advertising revenues, prohibitive licence fees, rising production costs linked to naira devaluation, and salary arrears for journalists have severely weakened the capacity of Nigerian media organisations to invest in editorial standards and fact-checking. As Fab-Ukozor and Etumnu (2023) observed, many online publications, driven by competition for web traffic and advertising revenue, prioritise speed over accuracy, publishing information first and verifying it later a practice that has become, in their assessment, “a Nigerian problem” endemic to the online media ecosystem.
Media literacy remains critically uneven across the Nigerian population, creating conditions in which large segments of the public are unable to distinguish between credible information and misinformation. Idris and Abdullahi (2023) conducted in-depth interviews with 200 social media users across Nigeria using a phenomenological approach and found that the majority of participants struggled with distinguishing legitimate news from misinformation, largely due to the absence of visible verification cues on social media platforms. As of January 2023, Nigeria had over 31.6 million social media users (Statista, 2023), many of whom particularly young people and older generations engage with online content without the critical digital literacy skills required to evaluate source credibility or detect manipulated media.
The government’s regulatory response to misinformation in Nigeria has been contentious and, critics argue, has often conflated the legitimate curbing of harmful falsehoods with the suppression of free expression. The suspension of Twitter/X from June 2021 to January 2022 following the platform’s deletion of a tweet by President Muhammadu Buhari significantly undermined online civic mobilisation. Proposed legislation, including the Social Media Bill and the Hate Speech Bill, has raised serious concerns among journalists, civil society organisations, and human rights groups about government overreach and the potential criminalisation of legitimate dissent. The Africa Center (2024) warned that across Africa, legislation ostensibly targeting digital disinformation has increasingly been weaponised to harass and detain journalists, with press freedom a critical protective barrier against disinformation in broad decline across the continent.
This study therefore situates itself at the intersection of media studies, political communication, and information science to provide a comprehensive, theoretically grounded, and empirically informed examination of fake news and misinformation in Nigerian online media spaces. By drawing on recent scholarship, institutional reports, and empirical data, the study seeks to advance understanding of the complex dynamics through which false information is produced, disseminated, consumed, and contested within Nigeria’s rapidly evolving digital information ecosystem.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
The unchecked proliferation of fake news and misinformation in Nigerian online media spaces constitutes a serious threat to the country’s democratic governance, social stability, and public well-being. Despite growing awareness of the problem and the efforts of fact-checking organisations such as Dubawa, Africa Check, and The Cable Lifestyle, false information continues to spread at a rate that outpaces the capacity of existing institutional and regulatory responses. The 2023 general elections demonstrated with stark clarity that misinformation has become systematically integrated into the political strategies of powerful actors, generating widespread confusion about electoral results and deepening distrust in democratic institutions. Yet, the scholarly literature on misinformation in Nigeria, while growing, remains fragmented, with insufficient attention paid to the structural, technological, and socio-cultural factors that distinguish the Nigerian experience of information disorder from its counterparts in other regions.
Furthermore, the emergence of AI-generated content, deepfakes, and coordinated inauthentic behaviour on social media platforms represents a rapidly escalating dimension of the problem that has yet to be adequately addressed in Nigerian media policy or scholarly inquiry. The interaction between social media misinformation and traditional media channels by which online falsehoods permeate offline information spaces through newspapers, radio broadcasts, and interpersonal communication further complicates the challenge of containment. Against this backdrop, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive scholarly examination of fake news and misinformation in Nigerian online media spaces that is grounded in current theoretical frameworks and draws on recent empirical evidence.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The broad objective of this study is to examine the phenomenon of fake news and misinformation in Nigerian online media spaces. Specifically, the study aims to:
i. Identify the conceptual distinctions between fake news, misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation as they apply to the Nigerian media context.
ii. Examine the key structural, technological, socio-cultural, and political factors that drive the production and dissemination of fake news in Nigerian online media spaces.
iii. Assess the impact of fake news and misinformation on democratic governance, electoral processes, inter-communal relations, and public health in Nigeria.
iv. Evaluate the adequacy of existing regulatory frameworks, fact-checking initiatives, and media literacy interventions in addressing misinformation in Nigeria.
v. Identify emerging threats to information integrity in Nigeria, including AI-generated content and coordinated disinformation campaigns, and recommend evidence-based policy interventions.
1.4 Research Questions
The following research questions guide this study:
i. How are fake news, misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation conceptually distinguished, and how do these distinctions apply to the Nigerian online media context?
ii. What are the principal structural, technological, socio-cultural, and political factors that facilitate the production and dissemination of fake news in Nigerian online media spaces?
iii. What are the documented impacts of fake news and misinformation on democratic governance, electoral processes, inter-communal relations, and public health in Nigeria?
iv. How adequate are existing regulatory, institutional, and media literacy responses to misinformation in Nigeria, and what gaps remain?
v. What emerging vectors of information disorder including AI-generated content and deepfakes pose new challenges for information integrity in Nigeria, and what interventions are most appropriate?
1.5 Significance of the Study
This study makes several significant contributions to scholarship and policy. First, it provides a comprehensive, theoretically grounded analysis of fake news and misinformation in Nigeria that draws on the most current empirical evidence available, addressing a notable gap in the existing literature on information disorder in sub-Saharan Africa. Second, by integrating insights from communication theory, political science, and digital media studies, the study offers a multidisciplinary framework for understanding the distinctive conditions that enable misinformation to flourish in Nigeria’s complex socio-political environment. Third, the study has direct policy relevance for Nigerian legislators, regulatory bodies,media practitioners, civil society organisations, and international development partners engaged in supporting press freedom and democratic governance in Nigeria. Fourth, the study contributes to the global conversation on the governance of digital information ecosystems, offering insights that are applicable to other low- and middle-income democracies experiencing comparable challenges.
1.6 Scope and Delimitation of the Study
This study focuses on the phenomenon of fake news and misinformation within Nigerian online media spaces, with particular emphasis on the period from 2019 to 2024. This timeframe encompasses two major electoral cycles the 2019 and 2023 general elections as well as the COVID-19 pandemic, during which misinformation reached particularly acute levels. The study is primarily concerned with online and digital media platforms, including social media, digital news outlets, and messaging applications, although it also considers the interaction between online misinformation and traditional media channels. The study does not attempt a comprehensive analysis of broadcast or print media misinformation, except insofar as these are influenced by or interact with online media content.
1.7 Theoretical Framework
This study is anchored in three complementary theoretical frameworks that together provide a robust analytical basis for examining fake news and misinformation in Nigerian online media spaces.
1.7.1 The Information Disorder Model (Wardle & Derakhshan, 2017)
The Information Disorder Model, developed by Wardle and Derakhshan (2017) for the Council of Europe, provides the primary conceptual framework for this study. The model distinguishes between misinformation (false information shared without intent to harm), disinformation (false information deliberately created and shared to cause harm), and malinformation (genuine information shared with the intent to cause harm). The model also identifies seven types of information disorder: satire/parody, misleading content, imposter content, fabricated content, false connection, false context, and manipulated content. By applying this framework to the Nigerian context, the study is able to move beyond reductive uses of the term “fake news” to examine the specific mechanisms and motivations through which different categories of false information are produced and disseminated in Nigeria’s digital media environment.
1.7.2 Agenda-Setting Theory (McCombs & Shaw, 1972)
Agenda-Setting Theory, first articulated by McCombs and Shaw (1972), posits that the media does not tell audiences what to think, but rather what to think about, by giving prominence to certain issues while downplaying others. In the context of fake news, this theory helps to explain how the deliberate amplification of false narratives through coordinated social media campaigns, politically motivated influencer networks, and the algorithmic privileging of emotionally engaging content shapes public attention and political opinion. In Nigeria, as Fab-Ukozor and Etumnu (2023) observed, the agenda-setting function of social media has been systematically exploited by political actors to direct public attention toward false narratives about electoral opponents, ethno-religious conflicts, and governance failures.
1.7.3 Two-Step Flow Theory (Katz & Lazarsfeld, 1955)
The Two-Step Flow Theory, proposed by Katz and Lazarsfeld (1955), holds that mass media messages do not flow directly to their audiences but are first received and interpreted by opinion leaders who then disseminate them within their social networks. This model has particular explanatory power in the Nigerian context, where social media influencers, religious leaders, community spokespeople, and political opinion leaders play a crucial role in mediating the reach and reception of both true and false information. The CDD West Africa (2022) documented the systematic recruitment of influencers into “situation rooms” tasked with monitoring and amplifying political disinformation, a finding that resonates powerfully with the dynamics described by two-step flow theory. Moreover, the theory helps explain the observation by the Social Science Research Council (2020) that disinformation spreading in Nigeria often moves from social media platforms into oral rumour networks and traditional media channels, amplifying its reach far beyond digital audiences.
1.8 Operational Definition of Key Terms
Fake News: For the purpose of this study, fake news refers to intentionally false or deliberately misleading information presented in the format and style of legitimate news, with the intent to deceive audiences for political, economic, or ideological purposes (Tandoc et al., 2018).
Misinformation: False or inaccurate information that is shared without deliberate intent to deceive, often arising from honest error, misunderstanding, or the inadvertent circulation of rumours (Wardle & Derakhshan, 2017).
Disinformation: False information that is deliberately created and disseminated with the express purpose of causing political, economic, reputational, or social harm to individuals, groups, or institutions (Wardle & Derakhshan, 2017).
Malinformation: Genuine, accurate information that is deliberately shared or weaponised to cause harm to individuals, organisations, or states, such as the non-consensual publication of private communications (Wardle & Derakhshan, 2017).
Online Media Spaces: Digital platforms and environments through which information is produced, shared, and consumed, including social media networks (Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter/X, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok), digital news outlets, blogging platforms, and messaging applications.
Information Disorder: An umbrella term denoting the broader ecosystem of false, misleading, and harmful information, encompassing misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation, and the structural, technological, and social conditions that enable their production and spread (Wardle & Derakhshan, 2017).
1.9 Organisation of the Study
This study is organised into five chapters. Chapter One, which has been presented above, provides the introduction, background of the study, statement of the problem, objectives, research questions, significance, scope, theoretical framework, and operational definitions. Chapter Two provides a comprehensive review of the existing literature on fake news and misinformation, with specific focus on the Nigerian context and relevant comparative cases from sub-Saharan Africa. Chapter Three presents the research methodology, detailing the research design, data collection strategies, and methods of analysis employed in the study. Chapter Four presents the findings of the study, with detailed analysis and discussion. Chapter Five draws together the conclusions of the study, synthesises the key findings, and offers recommendations for policy, practice, and future research.
REFERENCES
(Chapter One References — APA 7th Edition)
Africa Center for Strategic Studies. (2024, March 14). Mapping a surge of disinformation in Africa. Africa Center. https://africacenter.org/spotlight/mapping-a-surge-of-disinformation-in-africa/
Ajakaiye, H. (2024, December 20). Q&A: Manipulated media in the 2023 Nigerian presidential elections, generative AI, and possible interventions. Institute for Security and Technology. https://securityandtechnology.org/blog/qa-hannah-ajakaiye/
Akpan, U., Jibril, A. B., & Alika, H. (2024). New media and the proliferation of fake news in Nigeria: An empirical inquiry. Journal of African Media Studies, 16(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00134_1
Al Jazeera. (2023, February 15). Nigeria election triggers deluge of “fake news” on social media. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/2/15/nigeria-election-triggers-deluge-of-fake-news-on-social-media
Apuke, O. D., & Omar, B. (2020). Fake news proliferation in Nigeria: Consequences, motivations, and prevention through awareness strategies. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(2), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8236
Centre for Democracy and Development West Africa. (2022). Nigeria’s disinformation landscape: State-affiliated actors and coordinated inauthentic behaviour. CDD West Africa.
DataReportal. (2024, February 23). Digital 2024: Nigeria. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-nigeria
Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
Ezeah, G. H., Asogwa, C. E., & Edogor, I. O. (2023). Information literacy and social media: A case study of the Nigerian situation. Journal of Information Literacy, 7(2), 15–33.
Fab-Ukozor, N., & Etumnu, E. W. (2023). Social media fake news and its implications on elections in Nigeria. In N. U. Emeka-Nwobia, G. Umuzuruike, J. Aliede, S. Udeze, E. Mojaye, & J. N. Ogbodo (Eds.), Media and technology for better society: A festschrift for Professor Ifeyinwa Nsude (pp. 315–324). HAL Open Science.
Freedom House. (2024). Nigeria: Freedom on the Net 2024 country report. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/country/nigeria/freedom-net/2024
Idris, A., & Abdullahi, T. (2023). Challenges of verifying news on social media: Perspectives of Nigerian users. African Journal of Communication Studies, 11(1), 78–97.
Inobemhe, K., Apuke, O. D., & Onyisi, V. (2020). Curbing the menace of fake news and hate speech in Nigeria. In A. Ojedokun & E. T. Bankole (Eds.), Fake news and the politics of misinformation in Nigeria (pp. 11–29). African Humanities Press.
Jibril, A. B., Mukhtar, U., Sani, M. A., & Al-Hababi, A. (2025). Fake news in the Nigerian media landscape: Drivers, consequences and responses. Journal of New Media and Mass Communication, 12(1), 1–18.
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press.
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Nigerian Communications Commission. (2022). Industry statistics. NCC. https://www.ncc.gov.ng/stakeholder/statistics-reports/industry-overview
Pate, U. A., Gambo, D., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2019). The impact of fake news and the emerging post-truth political era on Nigerian polity: A review of literature. Studies in Media and Communication, 7(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v7i1.4135
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. (2024). Nigeria. Digital News Report 2024. University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2024/nigeria
Social Science Research Council. (2020, November 12). Nigeria’s disinformation landscape. Items. https://items.ssrc.org/disinformation-democracy-and-conflict-prevention/nigerias-disinformation-landscape/
Statista. (2023). Number of social media users in Nigeria as of January 2023. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/972911/number-of-social-media-users-nigeria/
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
Umejei, E., Ajaero, I., Samuels, G. E., et al. (2024). Fake news in Nigeria: Global phenomenon, local realities. Current Psychology, 43, 24482–24496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06013-5
Wardle, C. (2017). Fake news. It’s complicated. First Draft. https://firstdraftnews.org/articles/fake-news-complicated/
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Eur
