ANALYSIS OF LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUMS AND CLAIMS IN NIGERIA

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background to the Study

The relationship between premiums received and claims paid is the fundamental accounting identity of insurance. In life business that relationship is unusually complex, because the contracts are long-dated, because a substantial portion of the benefit is a savings accumulation rather than a pure risk transfer, and because the timing of claims is governed by mortality, surrender and maturity rather than by accident. Analysing the joint behaviour of life premiums and life claims therefore illuminates not merely the profitability of the business but the maturity structure of the industry, the nature of the products being sold, and the credibility of the promise being made to policyholders.

The Nigerian life market has changed shape rapidly. Life business generated ₦674.3 billion in the first half of 2025, an increase of 70.3 per cent year on year, and across the full year the life segment accounted for 31.6 per cent of an industry gross written premium of ₦2.30 trillion. The composition of that premium is striking: annuities contributed 44.3 per cent of life premiums, exceeding individual life at 36.2 per cent and group life at 19.5 per cent, and life insurance retention reached 94.1 per cent, reflecting substantial local risk-carrying capacity (National Insurance Commission [NAICOM], 2026). The dominance of annuities is a consequence of pension reform, as retirees convert accumulated balances into guaranteed income streams.

The claims side presents a more troubling picture. Industry gross claims fell by seven per cent to ₦724.7 billion in 2025, and the life segment settled 65.5 per cent of reported claims meaning roughly a third of reported life claims remained unsettled. For a class whose entire proposition is the certainty of payment at death, maturity or retirement, a settlement rate at that level is difficult to reconcile with the product promise. The regulatory response has been direct: NIIRA 2025 introduced zero tolerance for delayed claims settlement and established policyholder protection funds for insolvency cases, and in October 2024 NAICOM dissolved the board and management of an established life insurer over its inability to meet obligations to annuitants.

Underlying all of this is a market that remains extremely shallow. Insurance penetration in Nigeria stands below one per cent of GDP against an African average several times higher, and life insurance in particular competes for household savings against high nominal deposit and treasury yields in an environment of inflation above twenty per cent. Life expectancy at birth of approximately 54.6 years (World Bank, 2026) shapes both the demand for mortality protection and the pricing of it, while the absence of a Nigerian insured-lives mortality table means that the premiums being charged rest on foreign experience.

This study analyses the pattern, trend and relationship of life insurance premiums and claims in Nigeria.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

The Nigerian life insurance market is growing rapidly in nominal premium terms while settling a declining proportion of the claims reported to it. The relationship between these two movements has not been analysed, and four problems follow.

First, the growth may be nominal rather than real. Life premium growth of 70.3 per cent occurred alongside inflation exceeding twenty per cent and substantial currency depreciation. Without deflation, it cannot be determined whether the life market is genuinely deepening or repricing.

Second, the premium–claims relationship is unexamined in the new product mix. An annuity-dominated life book behaves quite differently from one dominated by individual whole life and endowment. Annuity premiums arrive as single lump sums while annuity claims are paid as a stream over decades, so the observed premium-to-claims ratio in an expanding annuity market will look highly favourable for many years and then deteriorate. Whether the industry's current ratios reflect genuine margin or the immaturity of the annuity book is not established.

Third, the settlement gap is not explained. A life settlement rate of 65.5 per cent may reflect documentation difficulty, delayed notification, disputed entitlement, deliberate delay or genuine incapacity to pay. Each has a different remedy, and the aggregate figure distinguishes none of them.

Fourth, the persistence of low penetration. Despite premium growth, life insurance reaches a small fraction of the population. Whether this reflects price, distribution, trust arising from claims experience, or competition from higher-yielding savings instruments is a question that analysis of the premium and claims series can help to address.

The problem, therefore, is the absence of a systematic analysis of Nigerian life insurance premiums and claims that separates real from nominal growth, accounts for the changed product mix, and relates claims settlement performance to market development.

1.3 Aim and Objectives of the Study

The aim of this study is to analyse life insurance premiums and claims in Nigeria.

The specific objectives are to:

1. examine the trend and growth pattern of life insurance premiums in Nigeria in nominal and real terms;

2. examine the trend and pattern of life insurance claims in Nigeria, including claims reported, claims settled and claims outstanding;

3. determine the relationship between life insurance premiums and life insurance claims in Nigeria;

4. analyse the composition of life premiums and claims across annuity, individual life and group life business;

5. examine the effect of macroeconomic variables inflation, interest rate, exchange rate and per capita income on life premiums and claims; and

6. assess the implications of the observed premium–claims relationship for the sustainability of the Nigerian life insurance market.

1.4 Research Questions

1. What has been the trend and growth pattern of life insurance premiums in Nigeria in nominal and real terms?

2. What has been the trend and pattern of life insurance claims reported, settled and outstanding in Nigeria?

3. What is the relationship between life insurance premiums and life insurance claims in Nigeria?

4. How is the composition of life premiums and claims distributed across annuity, individual life and group life business?

5. What effect do macroeconomic variables have on life insurance premiums and claims in Nigeria?

6. What do the observed patterns imply for the sustainability of the Nigerian life insurance market?

1.5 Research Hypotheses

The following null hypotheses will be tested at the 5% level of significance:

H₀₁: There is no significant relationship between life insurance premiums and life insurance claims in Nigeria.

H₀₂: There is no significant growth trend in real life insurance premiums in Nigeria over the study period.

H₀₃: There is no significant difference in the premium–claims relationship among annuity, individual life and group life business.

H₀₄: Macroeconomic variables have no significant effect on life insurance premiums and claims in Nigeria.

H₀₅: There is no significant long-run equilibrium relationship between life insurance premiums and claims in Nigeria.

1.6 Significance of the Study

For life insurance companies, the analysis clarifies whether reported margins reflect genuine underwriting profitability or the immaturity of a rapidly expanding annuity book, a distinction with direct implications for reserving and dividend policy. For NAICOM, it supplies evidence on the settlement gap in life business and on whether the claims provisions of NIIRA 2025 are being met, and informs supervisory calibration of life underwriting risk under the risk-based capital regime. For PenCom and pension fund administrators, whose retirees purchase annuities from life insurers, the findings bear directly on the security of retirement income. For policyholders and beneficiaries, the study documents the actual experience of claiming under a Nigerian life policy. For policymakers concerned with financial inclusion, the relationship between claims experience and market penetration is central to the reform objective of deepening insurance. For scholarship, the study supplies a segment-disaggregated, inflation-adjusted analysis of a series that has generally been examined only in nominal aggregate.

1.7 Scope of the Study

The study covers life insurance business in Nigeria over the period 2000 to 2025, a span of twenty-six years encompassing the 2007 consolidation, the Pension Reform Act annuity market, the IFRS 17 transition and the NIIRA 2025 reform. The variables examined are gross life premium written, net life premium, life claims reported, life claims settled, life claims outstanding, and life insurance funds and reserves, each disaggregated where data permit into annuity, individual life and group life business. Both nominal and inflation-adjusted series are analysed. Macroeconomic variables comprise the inflation rate, Monetary Policy Rate, naira–dollar exchange rate, GDP per capita and insurance penetration. Data are drawn from NAICOM Annual Reports and Market Performance Bulletins, the Nigeria Insurance Digest, the CBN Statistical Bulletin, National Bureau of Statistics publications and audited financial statements of life insurance companies. Analytical methods include descriptive and trend analysis, ratio analysis, correlation, regression, unit root and cointegration testing, and Granger causality testing. The study does not cover non-life business, health insurance under the NHIA, or pension fund administration.

1.8 Limitations of the Study

(i) Segment disaggregation NAICOM's reporting of life business split by annuity, individual and group lines is a comparatively recent practice, so a consistent segment series may not span the full study period. (ii) Claims data definitions the distinction between claims reported, claims settled, claims outstanding and claims repudiated is not applied uniformly across sources and periods. (iii) IFRS 17 discontinuity the change in insurance revenue and liability measurement from 2023 breaks comparability. (iv) Annuity timing mismatch because annuity premiums are received as lump sums while benefits are paid over decades, contemporaneous premium-to-claims ratios are structurally uninformative about ultimate profitability, and any inference must acknowledge this. (v) Deflation assumptions real-terms results depend on the choice of price index. (vi) Data revision recent NAICOM figures are provisional. (vii) Surrender and lapse data these are not consistently published, though they are material to life claims analysis.

1.9 Operational Definition of Terms

Life insurance: A contract under which the insurer undertakes to pay a specified sum on the death of the life assured, on survival to a specified date, or as a periodic income, in exchange for premiums.

Gross premium written: The total premium on life policies written in a period, before deduction of reinsurance ceded.

Annuity: A contract under which the insurer pays a periodic income to the annuitant, typically for life, in exchange for a lump sum consideration.

Group life insurance: A single contract covering the lives of a defined group, typically the employees of an employer, as required under the Pension Reform Act.

Claims reported: Claims notified to the insurer during a period, whether or not settled.

Claims settled: Claims paid by the insurer during a period.

Claims outstanding: Claims reported but not yet settled at the end of a period.

Life fund: The accumulated reserve held by a life insurer to meet its obligations under life policies in force.

Insurance penetration: Gross premium income expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product.

Insurance density: Gross premium income per head of population.

Premium retention ratio: The proportion of gross premium written retained by the insurer rather than ceded to reinsurers.

References

Central Bank of Nigeria. (2025). Statistical bulletin. CBN.

Dickson, D. C. M., Hardy, M. R., & Waters, H. R. (2020). Actuarial mathematics for life contingent risks (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Ehiogu, C. P., Eze, O. R., & Nwite, S. C. (2022). Economic impact of inflation and interest rate on life annuity business in Nigeria. British International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 6(2), 1–17.

Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2025). Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act, 2025. Federal Government Press.

Hafiz, U. A., Salleh, F., Garba, M., & Rashid, N. (2021). Projecting insurance penetration rate in Nigeria: An ARIMA approach. Revista Gestão Inovação e Tecnologias, 11(3), 5232–5243.

National Bureau of Statistics. (2025). Consumer price index and inflation report. NBS.

National Insurance Commission. (2026). Bulletin of the insurance market performance: Fourth quarter 2025. NAICOM.

Nigerian Insurers Association. (2024). Nigeria insurance digest 2023. Nigerian Insurers Association.

Outreville, J. F. (2013). The relationship between insurance and economic development: 85 empirical papers for a review of the literature. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 16(1), 71–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.2012.01219.x

World Bank. (2026). Life expectancy at birth, total (years) Nigeria [Data set]. World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=NG