FACTORS AFFECTING FARMERS’ ACCESS TO AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICES (A CASE STUDY OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN KPEVE, PEKI AND KPEVE-AGAME COMMUNITIES, SOUTH DAYI DISTRICT, VOLTA REGION)
Get complete chapters, abstract, references and questionnaire delivered to your WhatsApp or email.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Smallholder farmers produce most of the food
consumed in Ghana, but they are often constrained by limited knowledge of
improved technologies, inputs and markets. Agricultural extension is the main
way in which such knowledge is brought to them. Access to extension is
therefore an important condition for higher productivity and better welfare.
Aremu et al. (2025) used national panel data to examine the relationship
between agricultural extension services and household welfare in Ghana, which
shows the policy importance of extension access.
Availability of extension in a district does
not mean that every farmer has access to it. Anang and Asante (2020) studied
access to agricultural services among farm households in northern Ghana and
found that about 63 per cent of respondents had access to extension, and that
household income, off-farm income, household size and land area determined
access to services. Abdallah and Abdul-Rahaman (2016) examined determinants of
access to agricultural extension among smallholder rural women in northern Ghana,
and their work highlights the gender dimension of access. Anang et al. (2020)
also noted that the number of extension visits is limited by an inadequate
number of extension agents and cited evidence that male farmers in Ghana are
more likely to receive visits. Adams and Jumpah (2021) reported that age,
education, number of extension visits and farmer-based organisation membership
were significant factors in technology adoption, which means that the same
characteristics may affect who gets access in the first place.
South Dayi District in the Volta Region has a
District Agricultural Development Unit that facilitates agricultural production
and provides extension services, and the district hosts the Kpeve Agricultural
Station (Ministry of Food and Agriculture, n.d.). The main crops in the
district include maize, cassava, yam, cowpea and vegetables. Even so, available
studies of extension access concentrate largely on northern Ghana, and there is
little evidence on the factors that affect access in Kpeve, Peki and Kpeve-Agame.
This study was designed to fill that gap.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Extension services are intended to reach all
farmers, but many smallholders report little or no contact with extension
agents. Studies in Ghana suggest that access is shaped by farm size, income,
gender, group membership and the number of agents available (Anang &
Asante, 2020; Anang et al., 2020).
In Kpeve, Peki and Kpeve-Agame it is not known
what proportion of smallholder farmers has access to extension services, what
sources they use, and which personal, economic and institutional factors help
or hinder access. Without this information, extension providers may continue to
reach the same farmers while others are left out. The study therefore
investigates the factors affecting smallholder farmers’ access to agricultural
extension services in Kpeve, Peki and Kpeve-Agame communities, South Dayi District,
Volta Region.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The general objective of the study is to
identify the factors affecting smallholder farmers’ access to agricultural
extension services in Kpeve, Peki and Kpeve-Agame communities, South Dayi
District, Volta Region. The specific objectives are to:
(1)
describe the socio-economic
characteristics of smallholder farmers in the study communities;
(2)
identify the sources of
agricultural extension services available to the farmers;
(3)
determine the level of
farmers’ access to agricultural extension services;
(4)
identify the socio-economic
and institutional factors affecting farmers’ access to extension services; and
(5)
identify the constraints
farmers face in accessing extension services.
1.4 Research Questions
(1)
What are the socio-economic
characteristics of the smallholder farmers?
(2)
What sources of extension
services are available to the farmers?
(3)
What is the level of farmers’
access to extension services?
(4)
What socio-economic and
institutional factors affect access to extension services?
(5)
What constraints do farmers
face in accessing extension services?
1.5 Research Hypotheses
The following null hypotheses will be tested at
the 5% level of significance:
H01: There is no significant relationship
between the socio-economic characteristics of farmers (age, sex, education,
farm size and income) and their access to agricultural extension services.
H02: Membership of a farmer-based organisation
has no significant effect on farmers’ access to agricultural extension
services.
1.6 Significance of the Study
The study will show the South Dayi District
Agricultural Development Unit and other providers which farmers are being left
out and why. Farmers and farmer-based organisations will gain from
recommendations that improve access to extension. Policy makers can use the
findings to design more inclusive extension approaches, including group-based
and radio or mobile-phone-based methods. The study also adds to the limited
literature on extension access in the Volta Region.
1.7 Delimitation of the Study
The study is limited to smallholder farmers in
Kpeve, Peki and Kpeve-Agame in the South Dayi District of the Volta Region. It
covers the level of access to extension services and the factors affecting it.
It does not measure the impact of extension on farm output or income.
1.8 Limitations of the Study
The study is limited to three communities, so
its results may not represent all farmers in the Volta Region. Farmers may find
it hard to recall the number of extension contacts accurately, and some may
confuse extension agents with input dealers. Data collection may also be
affected by the farming season. The researcher will reduce these problems by
using a clear definition of extension access, trained enumerators and a
pre-tested questionnaire.
1.9 Definition of Terms
(1)
Access to extension services:
The ability of a farmer to reach, obtain and use information and advice from
extension providers.
(2)
Smallholder farmer: A farmer
who cultivates a small area using mainly family labour and produces largely for
household needs.
(3)
Farmer-based organisation: A
group of farmers who join together to share information, resources and market
opportunities.
(4)
Constraint: A factor that
limits or prevents farmers from accessing or using extension services.
1.10 Organisation of the Study
The study is organised into five chapters.
Chapter One presents the introduction, comprising the background, statement of
the problem, objectives, research questions, hypotheses, significance,
delimitation, limitations and definition of terms. Chapter Two reviews relevant
theoretical, conceptual and empirical literature. Chapter Three describes the
research methodology, including the study area, research design, population,
sampling procedure, data collection instruments and methods of data analysis.
Chapter Four presents and discusses the results, while Chapter Five gives the
summary of findings, conclusions and recommendations.
References
Abdallah,
A.-H., & Abdul-Rahaman, A. (2016). Determinants of access to agricultural
extension services: Evidence from smallholder rural women in Northern Ghana.
Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 9(3), 1–8.
Adams,
A., & Jumpah, E. T. (2021). Agricultural technologies adoption and
smallholder farmers’ welfare: Evidence from Northern Ghana. Cogent Economics
& Finance, 9(1), 2006905. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.2006905
Anang,
B. T., & Asante, B. O. (2020). Farm household access to agricultural
services in northern Ghana. Heliyon, 6(11).
Anang,
B. T., Bäckman, S., & Sipiläinen, T. (2020). Adoption and income effects of
agricultural extension in northern Ghana. Scientific African, 7, e00219.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00219
Aremu,
T., Baye, R. S., Onyina, K., & Abijah, P. (2025). Agricultural extension
services and household welfare: Evidence from Ghana Socioeconomic Panel Survey.
Agricultural and Food Economics, 13(1), 58.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-025-00400-7
Ministry
of Food and Agriculture. (n.d.). South Dayi District.
https://mofa.gov.gh/site/sports/district-directorates/volta-region/303-south-dayi
This project contains full academic material including literature review, methodology,
data analysis and conclusion.
VERIFIED COMPLETE RESEARCH PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS
60 PAGES
Need a Custom Project Written for You?
Our professional writers can write a unique, plagiarism-free project on any topic in your department — delivered before your deadline.