THE RESPONSIVENESS OF COMMERCIAL BANK LOANS TO ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA (2020–2025)
Get complete chapters, abstract, references and questionnaire delivered to your WhatsApp or email.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Finance is required by individuals, organizations and other economic
agents for different purposes. To provide the needed finance, there exist
varieties of institutions rendering financial services, broadly divided into
the money market and the capital market. In the money market, commercial banks
render financial services by way of intermediation, channeling funds from
surplus spending units to deficit spending units of the economy, thereby
transforming deposits into loans.
The role of credit in economic development is recognized through loans
obtained by various economic agents to meet operating expenses. Business firms
obtain loans to acquire machinery and equipment; farmers borrow to purchase
seeds and fertilizers and to erect farm structures; government bodies borrow to
finance recurrent and capital expenditure; and individuals and families take
loans to acquire goods and services. Alhassan, Ogoja, Hannah and Nkemakonam
(2022) note that banks perform this allocative role by mobilizing surplus funds
and directing them to entrepreneurs in the real sector, and recommend that
regulatory authorities continually free up the banking sector to avoid systemic
shocks that would otherwise disrupt this allocation. Loans extended on this
basis help firms attain efficient scale, support the expansion of informal
economic activity, and facilitate resource substitution, while also cushioning
an economic activity against total collapse following a natural disaster such
as flood, drought, disease outbreak or fire, or helping to revive an enterprise
that has suffered a setback.
The banking sector facilitates the availability of loans by mobilizing
surplus funds from savers with no immediate need for such funds and channeling
them to investors who possess viable ideas for wealth creation but lack the
capital to execute them. Kolawole, Abdulmumin, Babaita, Adejare, Osunkunle and
Adegboyega (2024) confirm, using an ARDL framework on Central Bank of Nigeria
data, that credit to the private sector has contributed positively to Nigeria's
economic growth, alongside a significant positive relationship between stock
market trading volume and growth. The sector remains of prime importance in
many developing economies because it is often the principal formal means of
attracting private savings on a large scale. More recent scholarship continues
to affirm this intermediation function: Adebayo (2025) notes that, although
financial development indices show a long-run cointegrating relationship with
output in Nigeria, the relationship is subtle and the contribution of credit to
growth is not always statistically robust, underscoring continuing debate over
how efficiently bank intermediation translates into growth.
By making loans available, banks render a valuable service because
production expands, capital investment increases, and a higher standard of
living is realized. Adeyemo and Tamunowariye (2022) similarly find a positive
nexus between financial development, trade performance and growth in Nigeria,
reinforcing the view that credit-driven financial deepening supports real
economic outcomes. Economic growth itself remains a principal objective of
macroeconomic policy and a crucial means of raising living standards and
achieving development. While economists define economic growth variously, it is
generally understood as an increase in national income or in the output of
goods and services over a given period, commonly proxied by an increase in
Gross Domestic Product (GDP). GDP is accordingly adopted as the proxy for
economic growth in this study, while bank loans refer to the aggregate funds
extended by commercial banks for consumption, business and investment purposes.
Recent empirical work reinforces the continued relevance of this subject. Using an Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) framework covering 1992 to 2023, a study on commercial and merchant bank credit found a positive short-run effect of credit expansion on output growth that reverses into a significant negative effect in the following period, while the long-run coefficient, though positive, was statistically insignificant, a pattern attributed to allocative inefficiencies and high lending costs (Adeyemi & Okonkwo, 2024). Similarly, a 2023 study covering an extended period found that bank credit had a measurable effect on the growth of the Nigerian economy, supporting the view that the banking sector's intermediation role remains consequential, even where its magnitude is debated (Eze & Out, 2023). At the sectoral level, evidence from 2022 to 2024 also shows that commercial bank credit allocated to agriculture has had a significant positive effect on output, even where credit to other sectors has not always shown the same result (Chukwu & Nwosu, 2022; Mathias & Inedu, 2023).
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Commercial banks have continued to extend credit to the Nigerian economy, yet the precise impact of this lending on growth remains contested. Between 2020 and 2025, Nigeria's economic growth rate has fluctuated markedly, shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic, naira redesign and foreign exchange unification, fuel subsidy removal, and tightened monetary policy, and the extent to which bank credit has driven growth through this turbulent period remains an open empirical question: some studies report a significant positive effect, while others find no significant effect at all.
The literature continues to debate the intermediary role of banks in
driving growth, although there is broad consensus that intermediation supports
growth in principle, with banks' traditional roles including the financing of
agriculture, manufacturing, and the syndication of credit to productive
sectors. The Nigerian banking industry has been subject to varying degrees of
regulation since the 1952 Banking Ordinance, a history marked by the rise and
collapse of numerous banks.
Recent studies sustain this line of inquiry into how regulation shapes
the growth contribution of bank credit. Agada (2023) conducted an ARDL-based
analysis of credit to commercial banks between 2000 and 2022 and found that
credit to the manufacturing sector had a positive and significant effect on
real GDP, while interest rate effects were also significant, suggesting that
the regulatory and pricing environment continues to shape how effectively bank
credit transmits to growth. Likewise, Olumide and Bassey (2024), in an
OLS-based study covering an extended post-2014 sample, reported a significant
positive effect of aggregate commercial bank credit on GDP, even as concerns
persist about allocative efficiency. Given the continuing intermediary role of
commercial banks and the unresolved nature of this debate, this study examines
the impact of commercial bank credit on economic growth in Nigeria.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The objectives of this research are to:
•
Examine the impact of commercial bank credit on
economic growth in Nigeria.
•
Examine the contribution of commercial bank credit to
Gross Domestic Product, with a view to assessing past and current trends based
on historical data and the effectiveness of the sector.
• Examine the extent to which intermediation credit to the private sector has influenced economic growth in Nigeria.
1.4 Research Questions
•
Does commercial bank credit contribute significantly to
economic growth in Nigeria?
•
How does growth in commercial bank credit respond to
real-sector growth, or vice versa?
•
To what extent does intermediation credit to the
private sector influence economic growth in Nigeria?
1.5 Research Hypotheses
•
H0: Commercial bank credit does not have a positive and
significant impact on the growth of the Nigerian economy.
•
H0: Commercial bank credit does not have a positive and
significant effect on Gross Domestic Product.
•
H0: Bank intermediation credit to the private sector of
the economy does not have a positive and significant influence on economic
growth in Nigeria.
1.6 Scope of the Study
This research focuses on the responsiveness of commercial bank credit to
economic growth in Nigeria. The scope is determined and limited by the sample
period chosen, covering 2020 to 2025, a period encompassing the COVID-19
pandemic shock, the 2023 foreign exchange and subsidy reforms, and subsequent
monetary policy tightening, all of which shaped the behaviour of bank credit
and its transmission to output.
1.7 Significance of the Study
This study is not the first in the field, as an extensive body of work
already exists on the role of commercial bank loans in Nigeria's economic
development. It nonetheless makes a distinct contribution by examining
institutional quality as a driver of growth in the Nigerian economy. This is
consistent with a growing recent literature linking institutional quality to
financial development and growth outcomes: Adegoke and Suleiman (2024) find
that institutional quality moderates the relationship between financial
development, external debt and growth among comparable developing economies,
while Pradhan (2023) similarly demonstrates strong interdependence between
institutional quality, financial development and sustainable growth in
lower-income countries. Within Nigeria specifically, recent extensions of the
institutional-quality literature continue to find that weak institutions
constrain the pace and quality of growth, supporting the broader proposition
that institutions in developing countries remain comparatively weak and that
this weakness shapes how effectively financial intermediation feeds into
growth.
The findings are expected to benefit the following groups:
General Public: The study will inform the public about the
relationship between borrowing from commercial banks and economic growth in
Nigeria, and encourage productive use of bank credit to enhance investment and
employment opportunities, which in turn supports economic growth.
Body of Literature: The study contributes to the existing
literature on the responsiveness of bank loans to economic growth in Nigeria.
Central Bank of Nigeria: The findings will assist the CBN in calibrating its monetary policy rate to guide commercial banks in setting interest rates on loanable funds.
Commercial Banks: The findings may encourage commercial banks to
adopt direct credit allocation favoring preferred sectors such as agriculture
and manufacturing, while monetary authorities may consider reducing legal
reserve requirements to enable banks to extend more credit to the economy.
REFERENCES
Adebayo, T. A. (2025). The relationship between financial development and economic growth in Nigeria. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 13(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2025-13-1-24-42
Adegoke, R. R., & Suleiman, H. (2024). Themoderating role of institutional quality in the debt stock–financial development–economic growth nexus: Evidence from the panel QARDL model. SN Business & Economics, 4, Article 93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-026-01093-w
Adeyemi, O., & Okonkwo, I. (2024). Commercial bank
credit and economic growth in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Innovation and
Technology, 4(3), 210–235.
Adeyemo, O. O., & Tamunowariye, C. (2022). The nexus between financial development, trade performance and growth in Nigeria. Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(3), 1–17.
Agada, A. E. (2023). Effect of credit to commercial banks on economic growth in Nigeria (2000–2022). Journal of Current Practice in Accounting and Finance, 14(6).
Alhassan, I. O., Ogoja, W. N., Hannah, E. E., & Nkemakonam, W. B. (2022). Impact of financial intermediation on economic growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 9(6), 70–78.
Chukwu, C. N., & Nwosu, P. (2022). Commercial bank credit to the real sector and economic growth in Nigeria: An OLS and ECM analysis. Journal of Finance and Banking Studies, 10(4), 33–50.
Eze, C., & Out, J. (2023). Bank credits and economic growth. Saudi Journal of Economics and Business Management, 10(10), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjebm.2023.v10i10.002
Kolawole, K. D., Abdulmumin, B. A., Babaita, K. A., Adejare, R. B., Osunkunle, U. A., & Adegboyega, A. H. (2024). Modelling the nexus between financial intermediation and economic growth in Nigeria. Expresión Económica, 53, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.32870/eera.vi53.1183
Mathias, A. C., & Inedu, H. (2023). Commercial banks’ credit allocated to agricultural sector and economic growth in Nigeria. Nigerian Agricultural Policy Research Journal, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.343420
Olumide, F., & Bassey, E. (2024). Bank credit and performance of economic growth: Evaluation of Nigerian experience (2000–2023). International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, IIARD.
Pradhan, R. P. (2023). Institutional quality, financialdevelopment and sustainable economic growth among lower income countries.
Natural Resources Forum, 47(2), 245–268.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12291
This project contains full academic material including literature review, methodology,
data analysis and conclusion.
VERIFIED COMPLETE RESEARCH PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS
67 PAGES.
Need a Custom Project Written for You?
Our professional writers can write a unique, plagiarism-free project on any topic in your department — delivered before your deadline.